Pension complaints are rising as member expectations accelerate in an increasingly digital world, according to Law Debenture, with early intervention and clear communication cited as critical to preventing issues from escalating.

In a post examining complaint management in pension administration, Law Debenture warned that notice-and-response models were increasingly out of step with members’ expectations of near-instant service, shaped by digital platforms and next-day delivery norms.

The firm noted complaints often arose at emotionally charged moments for members, such as retirement, leaving employment or dealing with bereavement, where misunderstandings around complex pension processes can quickly intensify frustration.

However, Law Debenture argued that many complaints reaching trustee level began as routine enquiries that escalated due to delayed or impersonal responses.

It stressed that the first point of contact was “the most critical moment” in determining whether an issue was resolved or developed into a formal complaint.

Law Debenture senior pensions executive, Angela Brown, explained that the difference between a handled concern and an escalated complaint often came down to listening.

“A phone call, genuine empathy and a named contact can completely defuse tension,” she said.

Law Debenture highlighted clear, jargon-free communication as the most effective preventive tool, particularly when schemes introduced changes affecting large groups of members.

It added that managing expectations around response times was equally important, with proactive updates helping to prevent frustration from building.

The firm also pointed to the value of independent oversight in identifying systemic issues.

For example, maintaining detailed complaint logs can reveal recurring problem areas, such as unclear correspondence or processes that consistently cause delays.

It noted that discretionary cases, including death benefit decisions, can be streamlined through improved documentation checks and administrator training, reducing repeated information requests and distress for families.

While acknowledging the growing role of technology in administration, Law Debenture emphasised that automation cannot replace human judgement and empathy, concluding that how trustees and administrators respond when issues arise can strengthen, rather than damage, member relationships.

---