Costs expected to limit smaller schemes' appetite for run on

Trustees and sponsors of defined benefit (DB) schemes smaller than £250m are unlikely to run on for purely economic reasons, Hymans Robertson has said, after its analysis found the cost of running a small DB pension scheme is four times the cost of running a large scheme.

The firm highlighted the “stark difference” in costs as one of the key considerations for trustees and sponsors when thinking about running on the scheme instead of undertaking buyout with an insurer.

Indeed, Hymans Robertson head of DB scheme actuary services, Laura McLaren, emphasised that running on beyond buyout funding is likely to be expensive for small schemes.

“TPR’s 2014 research found that the mean cost of running a small DB scheme was £1,054 per member, compared with £505 for a medium scheme and £281 for a large scheme," she explained.

"Based on these numbers, our modelling suggests that for small schemes annual expenses are 0.55 per cent of scheme assets, compared with 0.13 per cent for large schemes."

McLaren argued that the practical costs and challenges of managing a scheme for another 20 years also tend to be amplified for small schemes, emphasising that, even if a trustee or employer considers the cost of running on to provide good value, whether it’s the right choice depends on objectives and beliefs – and whether they align.

She continued: “Schemes also need to be clear about the costs and benefits of buying out with an insurer. Small schemes get similar longevity pricing to large schemes.

“When choosing between buying out and running on, trustees and sponsors should also consider the effect on members. Moving to an insurer frees the trustees of administering benefits, but it also takes away the control they have over the member experience.

“By keeping scheme surplus rather than passing on this value to an insurer, trustees retain control over where the money is invested.

"Surplus won’t emerge overnight, and small schemes have a smaller asset base with which to generate investment returns than large schemes. So trustees and sponsors need to take a long-term view, and decide how any value would be shared.”



Share Story:

Recent Stories


Endgames and LDI: Lessons to be learnt
At the PLSA Annual Conference, Laura Blows spoke to State Street Global Advisors EMEA head of LDI, Jeremy Rideau, about DB endgames and LDI in the wake of the gilts crisis of two years ago

A time for fixed income
Francesca Fabrizi discusses fixed income trends and opportunities with Goldman Sachs Asset Management Head of UK Pensions Solutions, Fixed Income Portfolio Management, Henry Hughes, in our Pensions Age video interview

Keeping on track
In the latest Pensions Age podcast, Sophie Smith talks to Pensions Dashboards Programme (PDP) principal, Chris Curry, about the latest pensions dashboards developments, and the work still needed to stay on track
Building investments in a DC world
In the latest Pensions Age podcast, Sophie Smith talks to USS Investment Management’s head of investment product management, Naomi Clark, about the USS’ DC investments and its journey into private markets

Advertisement