UK DB funding levels improve despite fall in surplus

The aggregate funding ratio for UK defined benefit (DB) pension schemes increased from 142.8 per cent to 143.9 per cent in January, despite downward trends in the estimated aggregate surplus, the latest Pension Protection Fund (PPF) 7800 Index has revealed.

According to the update, the aggregate surplus of defined benefit (DB) pension schemes fell from £428.2bn at the end of December 2023 to £425.4bn at the end of January 2024.

This was based on total assets of £1,395.2bn and total liabilities were £969.8bn, meaning that the funding ratio increased from 142.8 per cent at the end of December 2023 to 143.9 per cent.

However, there was an increase in the number of schemes in deficit, rising from 582 in December 2023 to 599 in January 2024, leaving 4,451 schemes in surplus.

In line with this, the deficit of the schemes in deficit at the end of January 2024 rose to £4.3bn, up from £3.7bn at the end of December 2023.

Commenting on the findings, PPF chief actuary, Shalin Bhagwan, suggested that the marginal changes to aggregate surplus and funding ratio somewhat mask the relatively large increase in bond yields over the month.

“This was driven by stronger-than-expected inflation data in the UK impacting the markets expectations about the pace of rate cuts by the Bank of England, as well as increased issuance from both governments and corporate borrowers,” Bhagwan explained.

“Volatile bond markets vindicate higher collateral buffers which, coupled with the ongoing private market denominator effect, appears to have added to the complexity of formulating an appropriate end-game plan and a corresponding investment strategy.”

Adding to this, Buck, A Gallagher Company, head of retirement consulting, Vishal Makkar, pointed out that the recently announced DB funding regulations are enabling schemes in surplus to contemplate higher risk investment strategies for those surplus assets, together with removal of the requirement for broad cash flow matching, both giving schemes more investment freedom.

"This potentially could increase immediate asset returns for pension schemes but also unlock new assets for investment on a long-term basis," he continued.

“It is worth noting, however, that any strategic decision should be in line with a scheme’s risk appetite, protect any liabilities, and meet its future cash flow and liquidity requirements.

"For schemes in a deficit, there is an inherent pressure to enhance the financial stability of the scheme, potentially resulting in more contributions for sponsors, which must be considered alongside its investment strategy.”



Share Story:

Recent Stories


Purposeful run-on
Laura Blows discusses purposeful run-on for DB schemes with Isio director, actuarial and consulting, Matt Brown, in Pensions Age’s latest video interview
Find out more about Purposeful Run On

DB risks
Laura Blows discusses DB risks with Aon UK head of retirement policy, Matthew Arends, and Aon UK head of investment, Maria Johannessen, in Pensions Age's latest video interview

Keeping on track
In the latest Pensions Age podcast, Sophie Smith talks to Pensions Dashboards Programme (PDP) principal, Chris Curry, about the latest pensions dashboards developments, and the work still needed to stay on track
Building investments in a DC world
In the latest Pensions Age podcast, Sophie Smith talks to USS Investment Management’s head of investment product management, Naomi Clark, about the USS’ DC investments and its journey into private markets

Advertisement