UCU threatens boycott of Trinity College over USS exit

The University and College Union (UCU) has censured Trinity College, Cambridge today, 21 June, and is threatening to boycott the college if it does not reconsider its withdrawal from the Universities Superannuation Scheme.

It comes as a vote to reconsider the decision to withdraw from the scheme at the college’s fellows meeting this morning lost by 46 votes to 73. The union’s decision to censure the college, taken at an emergency meeting of its higher education committee (HEC), means that if Trinity does not reverse its decision then it may boycott the institution.

A boycott is the union's strongest sanction and has only been used once before, on London Metropolitan University in 2009.

Trinity's decision to leave the scheme is based on a “wholly unlikely” scenario where the college would have to carry the can for pension liabilities if the rest of the higher education sector collapsed, as USS is a "last man standing scheme" with employers jointly liable.

UCU said Trinity's “overreaction to such an unlikely risk” would result in a scheme exit bill of millions and untold damage to its reputation if a boycott was sanctioned. The union said it was setting up a special committee to deal with the Trinity issue and said it hoped to meet with the college and press the case for it to reverse its decision before the boycott became necessary.

That committee will also consider what action the boycott would entail, but the union said it may include asking higher education staff across the globe to not attend, speak at or organise academic or other conferences at Trinity; not apply for jobs at Trinity; not give lectures at Trinity; not accept positions as visiting professors or researchers at Trinity; not write for any academic journal which is edited from Trinity; and, not take up new contracts as external examiners.

UCU head of higher education Paul Bridge said: “The cost to Trinity's reputation from a boycott will be far greater than the tiny risk of being left to carry the can for pensions if the higher education sector collapses. Trinity's overreaction to such an unlikely risk will cost the college millions of pounds and leave it at odds with the rest of the sector when it comes to pension provision.

“A boycott is our most serious sanction, but Trinity needs to be clear that we are prepared to implement one there. The sector needs to work together to deliver high quality, guaranteed pensions and it is up to Trinity to now reconsider its short-sighted decision.”

    Share Story:

Recent Stories


Purposeful run-on
Laura Blows discusses purposeful run-on for DB schemes with Isio director, actuarial and consulting, Matt Brown, in Pensions Age’s latest video interview
Find out more about Purposeful Run On

DB risks
Laura Blows discusses DB risks with Aon UK head of retirement policy, Matthew Arends, and Aon UK head of investment, Maria Johannessen, in Pensions Age's latest video interview

Keeping on track
In the latest Pensions Age podcast, Sophie Smith talks to Pensions Dashboards Programme (PDP) principal, Chris Curry, about the latest pensions dashboards developments, and the work still needed to stay on track
Building investments in a DC world
In the latest Pensions Age podcast, Sophie Smith talks to USS Investment Management’s head of investment product management, Naomi Clark, about the USS’ DC investments and its journey into private markets

Advertisement