Solvency II requirements not appropriate for all schemes - FRC

Proposed quantitative requirements based on Solvency II are not appropriate for all pension schemes, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has said.

The regulator has made the statement in its response to the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority’s draft advice to the European Commission on the review of the Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision directive.

The FRC said it was particularly concerned about the large increase in the regulatory burden that Solvency II style regulation would impose. EIOPA was “strongly urged” to carry out a thorough impact analysis before making any recommendations to the commission.

Chief executive of the FRC Stephen Haddrill said the regulatory and professional framework for UK pension funds promotes high quality provision supported by good corporate governance and advice.

“As proposed, the application of Solvency II requirements will make them far more expensive and risky for many employers leading to their early closure,” he said.

View the FRC’s response to the consultation here.

    Share Story:

Recent Stories


Private markets – a growing presence within UK DC
Laura Blows discusses the role of private market investment within DC schemes with Aviva Director of Investments, Maiyuresh Rajah

The DB pension landscape 
Pensions Age speaks to BlackRock managing director and head of its DB relationship management team, Andrew Reid, about the DB pensions landscape 

Podcast: From pension pot to flexible income for life
Podcast: Who matters most in pensions?
In the latest Pensions Age podcast, Francesca Fabrizi speaks to Capita Pension Solutions global practice leader & chief revenue officer, Stuart Heatley, about who matters most in pensions and how to best meet their needs

Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement